Drawing for STEAMCAFE

USPTO serial 86144012

STEAMCAFE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KERTGATE, AMY L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STEAMCAFE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian J. Philpott

Brian J. Philpott KOPPEL PATRICK HEYBL & PHILPOTT2815 TOWNSGATE ROAD, SUITE 215WESTLAKE VILLAGE, CA 91361UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Electric coffee brewers; Electric coffee machines; Electric coffee makers; Electric coffee percolators; Electric coffee pots; Electric espresso machines; Electric tea kettles; Electric tea potsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 22, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 22, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 4, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 3, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 16, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 16, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 19, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 19, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 8, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 8, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 22, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 27, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 27, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 7, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 21, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 21, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 28, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 28, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 27, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 27, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 19, 2014ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 31, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Dec 28, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 18, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance