USPTO serial 86144544
EPSERVICES FOR PREMIUM PERFORMANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 5, 2016
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with EPSERVICES FOR PREMIUM PERFORMANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $548*
Plus Government fees of $1,700
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J. Hurley
David J. Hurley KNECHTEL, DEMEUR & SAMLAN525 W MONROE STSTE 2360CHICAGO, IL 60661-3720Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | [ Installation, maintenance and repair of computer hardware; ] providing repair information of equipment in life science laboratories; [ disinfecting; interference suppression services in electrical apparatus; ] installation and repair of electric life science laboratory apparatus and refrigerating apparatus; installation of machines and laboratory machine equipment; rebuilding of worn or partially destroyed machines, motors and engines, and of laboratory equipment; scientific services, namely, operational safety for life science laboratory equipment in the nature of instrument preventative maintenance service, namely, centrifuge maintenance and rotor inspection in the course of maintenance | ACTIVE | Nov 30, 2013 |
| 042 | [ Scientific services, namely, scientific development and design of applications in the nature of scientific research, scientific laboratory services and scientific testing for use in liquid handling, cell manipulation, centrifugation, photometric detection, PCR, namely, polymerase chain reaction in the nature of biological DNA cloning, cycle sequencing for biological cloning and imaging of single cell gene expression for biological cloning, and sample cell heating, and sample cell freezing, and sample cell mixing, cell incubating, cell culturing, cell shaking, and cell sample storage, bioprocessing of cells, and biological decontamination, and analysis of samples in the fields of liquid handling, cell manipulation, centrifugation, photometric detection, PCR, namely, polymerase chain reaction in the nature of biological DNA cloning, cycle sequencing for biological cloning and imaging of single cell gene expression for biological cloning, and sample cell heating, and sample cell freezing, and sample cell mixing, cell incubating, cell culturing, cell shaking, and cell sample storage, bioprocessing of cells, and biological decontamination to assure compliance with industry standards; development of new technology for others in the field of biotechnology for use in liquid handling, cell manipulation, centrifugation, photometric detection, PCR, namely, polymerase chain reaction in the nature of DNA cloning, cycle sequencing for biological cloning and imaging of single cell gene expression for biological cloning and, and sample cell heating, and sample cell freezing, and sample cell mixing, cell incubating, cell culturing, cell shaking, and cell sample storage, bioprocessing of cells, and biological decontamination; scientific laboratory services in the fields of liquid handling, cell manipulation, centrifugation, photometric detection, PCR, namely, polymerase chain reaction in the nature of biological DNA cloning, cycle sequencing for biological cloning and imaging of single cell gene expression for biological cloning, and sample cell heating, and sample cell freezing, and sample cell mixing, cell incubating, cell culturing, cell shaking, cell sample storage, bioprocessing of cells, and biological contamination; and medical and scientific research and design relating thereto in fields of liquid handling, cell manipulation, centrifugation, photometric detection, PCR, namely, polymerase chain reaction in the nature of DNA cloning, cycle sequencing for biological cloning and imaging of single cell gene expression for biological cloning, and sample cell heating, and sample cell freezing, and sample cell mixing, cell incubating, cell culturing, cell shaking, and cell sample storage, bioprocessing of cells, and biological decontamination; ]updating of computer software; [ surveying; monitoring of computer systems by remote access to ensure proper functioning; ] installation of computer software; [ material testing; ] quality control for others; and providing software repair information; [ cell manipulation in the nature of transformation of nucleic acids in bacteria and yeast cells for scientific research purposes; ] scientific services, namely, operational safety for life science laboratory equipment in the nature of electrical product safety testing | ACTIVE | Nov 30, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EPPENDORF SE
- Other trademarks owned by Eppendorf AG
- Other trademarks owned by Eppendorf AG
- Other trademarks owned by Eppendorf AG
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named EPSERVICES FOR PREMIUM PERFORMANCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2023 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2023 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 6, 2023 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2023 | PUM2 | OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU2 | — |
| Jul 13, 2023 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2023 | PUM1 | OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU1 | — |
| Jan 9, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 21, 2022 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2022 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 5, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 31, 2016 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2016 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 27, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 10, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2016 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2016 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 16, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 18, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 20, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 25, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 5, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 15, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 15, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2014 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2014 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2014 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 26, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 30, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 9, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 12, 2014 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 12, 2014 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 12, 2014 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 7, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |