USPTO serial 86145216
REBEL MOTORCYCLE BOOTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 19, 2017
- Examiner
- CHOSID-BROWN, ROBIN S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with REBEL MOTORCYCLE BOOTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LOS ANGELES, CA, US
LOS ANGELES, CA, US
Los Angeles, CA, US
LOS ANGELES, CA, US
LAS VEGAS, NV, US
LOS ANGELES, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew T. Rissler
Andrew T. Rissler PATEL & ALMEIDA PC22543 Ventura Blvd, Ste 220 #1200Woodland Hills, CA 91364UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Boots; Boots for motorcycling; Leather boots; Motorcyclist boots; Riding boots | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TEGOL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by TEGOL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Helmet Venture, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by TEGOL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NANAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by WESTSHORE DISTRIBUTOR, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named REBEL MOTORCYCLE BOOTS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2026 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 14, 2024 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2024 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 14, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 19, 2023 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 11, 2017 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 1, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2015 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Apr 10, 2015 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 27, 2015 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 21, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 31, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 31, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 17, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 20, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 18, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |