USPTO serial 86145801
SKIMMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCDOWELL, MATTHEW J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SKIMMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Clonee, County Meath, IE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Colin O'Brien
COLIN O'BRIEN PARTRIDGE IP LAW P.C.321 N CLARK ST STE 720CHICAGO, IL 60654-5011UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dietetic foodstuffs especially for diabetics, lactose intolerance or Coeliac's disease, namely, biscuits, snack bars, wafers, bakery goods, crisps, crackers, substitutes for potato chips, savory crisps, savory crackers and meal replacement bars; foodstuffs for dieters or the health conscious, namely, biscuits, snack bars, wafers, bakery goods, crisps, crackers, substitutes for potato chips, savory crisps, savory crackers and meal replacement bars for weight loss purposes; low glycemic index sweets and confectionery, namely, sweets for medicinal purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Potato crisps, potato-based snack foods, fruit-based snack foods | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Chocolate substitutes; snack foods, namely, starch-based foods containing added vitamins, phytonutrients, minerals, essential oils or probiotic bacteria; corn-based foods containing added vitamins, phytonutrients, minerals, essential oils or probiotic bacteria; milk protein-based foods containing added vitamins, phytonutrients, minerals, essential oils or probiotic bacteria; biscuits, wafers, bakery goods, crackers; breakfast biscuits; breakfast cereals; granola-based snack bars; cereal-based snack foods and crisps; confectionery products, namely, confectionery made of sugar; non-medicated confectionery made of sugar containing added vitamins, phytonutrients, minerals, essential oils or probiotic bacteria | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 12, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 16, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 29, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 26, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 25, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |