Drawing for THERMA-CLEAN

USPTO serial 86146053

THERMA-CLEAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CANTONE, KERI H
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THERMA-CLEAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JungJin Lee

JUNGJIN LEE LEE LEE & ASSOCIATES PC2531 JACKSON AVESTE 234ANN ARBOR, MI 48103-3818

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Vacuum cleanersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 1, 2015MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 28, 2015ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 28, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 17, 2015EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 1, 2015GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 1, 2015GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 1, 2015CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 22, 2015NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
May 22, 2015PGTTPETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED—
May 22, 2015ERTPTEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED—
May 22, 2015EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 22, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 22, 2015EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 9, 2015PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
May 8, 2015APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Apr 21, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 21, 2015PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 19, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 19, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 1, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 30, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 1, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 2, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance