USPTO serial 86146534
INETCO NETSTREAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KON, ELISSA GARBER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INETCO NETSTREAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jill J. Chalmers
JILL J. CHALMERS BRYAN CAVE LLP90 S CASCADE AVE STE 1300COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80903-1679UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software for monitoring the performance of computer and IT networks, data centers, and enterprise applications, and diagnosing performance problems at the application, network and device layers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Application Service Provider (ASP) featuring software for monitoring the performance of computer and IT networks, data centers, and enterprise applications, and diagnosing performance problems at the application, network and device layers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 18, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 10, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 29, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 19, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 12, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 11, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 1, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 29, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 8, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 22, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 26, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 2014 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |