USPTO serial 86147490
NF SPHAGNUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, BRIDGETT G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NF SPHAGNUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard N. Aronson
HOWARD N. ARONSON LACKENBACH SIEGEL LLP1 CHASE RDLACKENBACH SIEGEL BUILDINGSCARSDALE, NY 10583-4156Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Horticultural growing media mixtures for seed germination in plugs, trays or floating systems, for bedding plants, potted plants, propagation and cuttings and for general greenhouse and nursery usage primarily comprised of peat, perlite, vermiculite, fertilizer, rock wool, polymers, compost, sand, wetting agents and wood fiber from sphagnum peat moss fibre and wood fibre; Growing media mixes made from organic components used to grow organic fruits, fine herbs and vegetables, namely, peat, composted peat, bark, wood fiber, yucca based wetting agent and natural pellet fertilizer | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Natural peat moss; natural sphagnum peat moss | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 6, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 5, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 7, 2017 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 3, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 2, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 28, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 30, 2017 | RGRR | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 24, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 13, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 12, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 18, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 2, 2014 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 2, 2014 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2014 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2014 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |