Drawing for MIRACULOUS MARACUJA NOURISHING MASCARA

USPTO serial 86147718

MIRACULOUS MARACUJA NOURISHING MASCARA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAYES, LAURIE ANN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MIRACULOUS MARACUJA NOURISHING MASCARA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Emily C. Holmes

Emily C. Holmes Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP410 Seventeenth Street, Suite 2200Denver, CO 80202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics containing maracujaACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 21, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 21, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 31, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2017EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 14, 2017EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 14, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 30, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 15, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 15, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 13, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 15, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 15, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 14, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 14, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 21, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 15, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 15, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 4, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 3, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 2, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 15, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 15, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 15, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 20, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 20, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 30, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 22, 2014CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 22, 2014COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 14, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 1, 2014DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Apr 1, 2014RFTPREMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS—
Mar 26, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 19, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 18, 2014CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Mar 18, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 18, 2014GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Mar 18, 2014GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Mar 18, 2014CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Mar 16, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 6, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance