USPTO serial 86148432
VEDICA ORGANICS SWEET TASTE OF PURITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARLSON, KRISTIN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VEDICA ORGANICS SWEET TASTE OF PURITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ron Levy, Esq.
RON LEVY, ESQ. LEVY INTERNATIONAL LAW, LLC50 JERICHO TPKE STE 201JERICHO, NY 11753-1014UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Organic drinkable soups; Organic extracts for soups; Organic fruit-based food beverage; Fruit-based organic food bars; Organic mixes for making soup; Nut-based organic snack foods, namely, nut clusters; Organic snack food dips; Vegetable-based organic food beverages; Vegetable-based organic snack foods; Organic coconut oil and fat; Organic corn oil; Organic dairy-based food beverages; Organic fruit and soy based snack food; Organic fruit and vegetable granules for use in prepared meals or food; Organic fruit concentrates and purees used as ingredients of foods; Organic milk powder for food purposes; Organic non-fat, low-carbohydrate, high-protein dairy-based mix for making non-dessert foods, namely, organic health bars and protein bars; Organic nut-based snack foods; Nut-based snack foods, namely, organic nut crisps; Organic olive oil; Organic cream; Organic milk; Organic nut and seed-based snack bars; Organic rice bran oil; Organic sesame oil; Organic soup concentrates; Organic soup mixes; Organic soups; Organic soy-based food bars; Organic soy-based food beverage used as a milk substitute; Organic soy-based snack foods; Organic sunflower oil | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Organic beverages made of tea; Organic green tea; Organic herb tea; Organic herbal tea; Organic tea; Organic tea bags; Organic barley flour; Organic buckwheat flour; Organic cereal bars; Organic cereal-based snack foods; Organic chutneys; Organic flavourings for soups; Organic food flavorings, namely, infused oils, not being essential oils; Organic grain-based food bars also containing other ingredients, namely, nuts, lentils, dried fruits, soy, grains; Organic grain-based food beverages; Organic grain-based snack foods; Organic grass-based food beverages; Organic herbal food beverages; Organic honey; Organic multigrain-based snack foods; Organic curry sauces; Organic processed cereals; Organic ready-to-eat cereals; Organic wheat-based snack foods | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Organic fresh fruit; Organic fresh fruit and vegetables; Organic fresh herbs; Organic fresh vegetables; Unprocessed organic cereal seeds; Unprocessed organic cereals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Vedica Organics, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named VEDICA ORGANICS SWEET TASTE OF PURITY
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 13, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 3, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 31, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |