Drawing for BODY RAPPORT

USPTO serial 86149103

BODY RAPPORT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BODY RAPPORT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sally M. Abel, Christine B. Redfield

SALLY M. ABEL, CHRISTINE B. REDFIELD FENWICK & WEST LLPSILICON VALLEY CENTER801 CALIFORNIA STREETMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041-1990

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044Bodywork therapyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 30, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 30, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 19, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 18, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 18, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 16, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 16, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 28, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 2, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 2, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 13, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 26, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 15, 2014DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Jul 15, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 15, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 8, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 8, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 7, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 24, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance