Drawing for PRO GIRL

USPTO serial 86150027

PRO GIRL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAPTER, ALAIN J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRO GIRL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Catherine S. Collins

CATHERINE S. COLLINS WARNER NORCROSS & JUDD LLP111 LYON ST NW STE 900GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49503-2487UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009VIDEO RECORDINGS FEATURING NEWS AND INFORMATION IN THE FIELDS OF BEAUTY, FASHION, AND LIFESTYLE; DOWNLOADABLE ELECTRONIC PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY, MAGAZINES AND NEWSLETTERS IN THE FIELDS OF BEAUTY, FASHION, AND LIFESTYLEACTIVE—
036PROVIDING PHILANTHROPIC SERVICES, NAMELY, SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF OUTREACH, PARTNERSHIPS, FUND RAISING, CAMPAIGNS, AND EDUCATION TO GENERAT SUPPORT AND AWARENESS OF DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN AND GIRLS AT HIGH RISKACTIVE—
041PROVIDING ADVICE, SEMINARS, EDUCATION, NAMELY, CLASSES, AND TRAINING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF LIFESTYLE; PROVIDING A WEBSITE FEATURING NEWS, INFORMATION AND ADVICE ON LIFESTYLE; PROVIDING CONSULTING SERVICES TO OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF LIFESTYLEACTIVE—
044PROVIDING ADVICE IN THE FIELD OF BEAUTY; PROVIDING A WEBSITE FEATURING INFORMATION AND ADVICE IN THE FIELD OF BEAUTY; PROVIDING CONSULTING SERVICES TO OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF BEAUTYACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 28, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 28, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 19, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 18, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 18, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 13, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 13, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 3, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 22, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 22, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 1, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 29, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 25, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 21, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 21, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 28, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 2, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 2, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 13, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 28, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 28, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 3, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 3, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 7, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 7, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 7, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 2, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 2, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 2, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 4, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 8, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 24, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance