Drawing for VIPER

USPTO serial 86150703

VIPER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GUSTASON, ANNE C
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with VIPER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David W. Nagle, Jr.

DAVID W NAGLE JR STITES & HARBISON PLLC400 W MARKET STREETSUITE 1800LOUISVILLE, KY 40202-3352

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Hand-held protective shields for use by police, detention centers, correctional facilities and the like; protective shield system, namely, frame mounted in vehicle for storing a hand-held protective shield for use by police, detention centers, correctional facilities and the likeABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 19, 2015MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
May 19, 2015ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
May 19, 2015OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 19, 2015OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jan 28, 2015OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 28, 2014ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 30, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 10, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 18, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 15, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 23, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 23, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 16, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 9, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 9, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 9, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 26, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance