USPTO serial 86151038
REVIZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGLETON, RUDY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with REVIZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sheldon Lazarovitz
SHELDON LAZAROVITZ Sheldon Lazarovitz Law Office31 WESTGATE BLVD.TORONTO, ONTARIO, M3H1N8CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software application that digitally manipulates photographs of natural persons to reveal changes in appearance after the surgical and cosmetic removal of wrinkles and to depict age regression in the person; software as a services for the digital manipulation of photographs of natural persons to reveal changes in appearance after the surgical and cosmetic removal of wrinkles and to depict age regression in the person | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 28, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 28, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 10, 2018 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 19, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 7, 2017 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2017 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 24, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 15, 2016 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 22, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2016 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 7, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 13, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2014 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 7, 2014 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 26, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |