Drawing for LORIÑON

USPTO serial 86151447

LORIÑON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 607
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LORIÑON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. Scott Gerien

J. Scott Gerien Dickenson, Peatman & Fogarty1455 First Street, Ste. 301Napa, CA 94559UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033WinesACTIVEMay 3, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 15, 2017MAB7ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
Sep 15, 2017ABN7ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
Dec 27, 2016INCSITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR STATEMENT OF USE—
Dec 6, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 16, 2016IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 16, 2016EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
May 17, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 22, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 2, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 12, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 11, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 11, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 28, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 21, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 21, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 27, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 20, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 10, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 14, 2015ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 13, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2014NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 30, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 29, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 29, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 29, 2014PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 29, 2014PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 28, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 1, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 10, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 26, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance