USPTO serial 86151723
ASPIR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5173897Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 4, 2017
- Examiner
- CROSS, TRACY L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ASPIR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Weir Minerals Australia Limited
Artarmon NSW, AU
Weir Minerals Australia Limited
Artarmon NSW, AU
Weir Minerals Australia Limited
Artarmon, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer M. Hetu
Jennifer M. Hetu Honigman LLP39400 Woodward Avenue, Suite 101Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304-5151UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Adhesives for ceramic coating that is resistant to wear; chemicals used in abrasion, wear and corrosion resistant coatings namely, alumina beads and unprocessed epoxy resins | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 002 | Abrasion, wear and corrosion resistant ceramic-based epoxy coatings | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 006 | Pipes and tubes of metal; metal pipes lined with polyurethane; metal pipes lined with ceramic; wire mesh; wire panels for straining; Metal hardware, namely, pulleys; stainless steel strainers used in minerals processing machines | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 007 | Minerals processing machines; conveyors; conveyor rollers; conveyor idlers; cyclones; centrifugal separators; vibratory screen separators; filters for minerals processing machines; centrifuges; baskets for centrifuges; ceramic tiles for lining machines, machine parts and accessories; Pulleys being parts of machines; polyurethane parts for machines, mining machines and mineral processing equipment, namely, screens for sorting of materials, wear resistant linings | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | Ceramic lined non-metal flexible pipes; polyurethane lined non-metal flexible pipes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | Ceramic lined non-metal rigid pipes; polyurethane lined non-metal rigid pipes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Weir Minerals Australia Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Weir Minerals Australia Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Weir Minerals Australia Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named ASPIR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2023 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 4, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2020 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Aug 7, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 7, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 17, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 28, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2016 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 16, 2016 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Dec 12, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 2, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 7, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2016 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 31, 2016 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 16, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 13, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 21, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 17, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 6, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 4, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 27, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 30, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |