USPTO serial 86151876
TSUBAKI E&M CO.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENJAMIN, SARA NICOLE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TSUBAKI E&M CO.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Nagaokakyo Kyoto, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas R. Wolf
DOUGLAS R. WOLF WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.600 ATLANTIC AVE FL 23BOSTON, MA 02210-2206UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Chains, cable drag chains, belts, pulleys, couplings, clutches, and torque limiters, all for power transmission in industrial machines; chains for conveyors; sprockets for conveyor and power transmission machinery; conveyors, bucket elevators, lifters being elevators, carousels being rotating machines and sorters being sorting machines, all for handling materials; shaft couplings as parts of machines; torque converters, not for land vehicles; limiting devices, namely, over-load clutches for machines; key-less shafts for machines; hub coupling devices in the nature of couplings, not for land vehicles; engines, not for land vehicles; gear, linear, and inverter motors other than for land vehicles; electric motors, not for land vehicles; engine timing components, namely, cam sprockets, crankshaft sprockets, chains, tensioners being chain and belt tensioners, tensioner levers being levers for chain and belt tensioners, and chain guides being guides for chains, all for machines; electrically powered linear actuators; pneumatic linear actuators; shock absorbers for machines; cylinders for motors and engines; index drives for use in industrial machines; industrial robots; continuously variable speed changers for use in industrial machines, namely, speed change gears for machines; speed governors for machines, engines and motors; speed reducers for machines, namely, speed reducing gears for machines; speed reducers for electric motors, namely, speed reducing gears for electric motors; gears for machines; gear boxes other than for land vehicles; bearings, as parts of machines; agricultural machinery, namely, combines; agricultural machinery, namely, harvesters | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | electric couplings; electric actuators; automatic electronic controls for industrial machinery; electronic speed controls for motors; electronic safety controls for electric motors and engines; electronic signal transmitters and receivers for use with industrial machinery | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 23, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 21, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 16, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 30, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |