Drawing for ALSO KNOWN AS

USPTO serial 86152311

ALSO KNOWN AS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMAS, JULIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ALSO KNOWN AS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gregg Donnenfeld

GREGG DONNENFELD Donnenfeld Law, PLLCP.O. Box 280Greenvale, NY 11548UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, shirts, sweatshirts, pants, jeans, shorts, socks, belts, sleepwear, underwear, swimwear, jackets and coats; headwear; footwearACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 17, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 16, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 30, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 29, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 29, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 16, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 31, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 25, 2016CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 25, 2016COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 24, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 30, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 30, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 16, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 21, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 21, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 1, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 18, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 18, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 18, 2015RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 11, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 29, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 4, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 4, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 5, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 13, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 28, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance