Drawing for LQ HOTEL

USPTO serial 86152748

LQ HOTEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LQ HOTEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kay Lyn Schwartz

KAY LYN SCHWARTZ GARDERE WYNNE SEWELL LLP2021 McKinney Avenue, Suite 1600IP SECTIONDALLAS, TX 75201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041providing facilities for recreation activitiesACTIVE—
043services for providing food and drink; restaurant; catering and bar services; provision of conference, exhibition, banquet, social function and meeting facilitiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 11, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 12, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 12, 2017NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
May 11, 2017EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 11, 2017DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 5, 2017DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
May 5, 2017ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
May 4, 2017EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 4, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 20, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 27, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 18, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 18, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 1, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 29, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 15, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 15, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 5, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 4, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 2, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 26, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 26, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 7, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 5, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 5, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 5, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 4, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 9, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 20, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 3, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 24, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 22, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 21, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 23, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 14, 2014MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jan 13, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 30, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance