Drawing for TIGER TIGER CORPORATION

USPTO serial 86153330

TIGER TIGER CORPORATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POVARCHUK, REBECCA JOYCE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TIGER TIGER CORPORATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gary D. Krugman

GARY D. KRUGMAN SUGHRUE MION, PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037-3202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail services for electric food blenders, electric food mixers, having food crushing, milling and grating functions, electric milling and cleaning machines, electric rice cookers, electric pots for keeping rice warm, electric hot-water pots, electric kettles, electric grill pans, electric hot plates, electric coffee makers, electric toasters, electric waffle makers, electric hot sandwich makers, electric cooking fryers, electric fish roasters, electric air purifiers, electric air humidifiers, electric cooking ovens, electric cooking pots, electric tableware driers, electric rice cookers for commercial use, electric pots for making rice porridge, electromagnet cooker, microwave oven, keep-warm lunch boxes, stainless steel vacuum flasks, stainless steel food containers, vacuum bottles, heat insulated mugs of stainless steel, heat insulated pitchers, containers for storing and dispensing rice, keep-warm food containers, heat insulated containers for food or beverage, thermal vacuum cookersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 31, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 31, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 4, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 14, 2014MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jan 13, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 31, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance