USPTO serial 86154323
SENSOREE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINNEGAN, TIMOTHY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SENSOREE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PATRICK T. REILLY
PO BOX 7218SANTA CRUZ, CA 95061-7218UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic circuits and modules adapted for incorporation with clothing, namely, logic circuit boards, servo-motors, electric stimulation signal emitters, namely, light emitting diodes, touch sensors, Electroacoustic transducers that generate vibrations, acoustic sensors, Electric or electronic sensors for bioelectric signal detection, and electronic devices that release odors, namely, natural scents from animals and plants, and scents evocative of natural sources; Wearable bioelectric sensing electronics, namely, EKG leads, ECG leads, EEG leads, galvanic skin response sensors, infra-red light sensors, and heart rate sensors Wearable electronics, namely, EKG leads, ECG leads, EEG leads, galvanic skin response sensors, infra-red light sensors, and heart rate sensors, coupled with light emitters; Wearable electronics, namely, EKG leads, ECG leads, EEG leads, galvanic skin response sensors, infrared light sensors, and heart rate sensors, for use within clothing, namely, bioelectric sensors coupled with light emitters; Bioelectric sensor circuits, namely, EKG leads, ECG leads, EEG leads, galvanic skin response sensors, infra-red light sensors, and heart rate sensors adapted for incorporation with textile and clothing; Bioelectric sensor circuits, namely, EKG leads, ECG leads, EEG leads, galvanic skin response sensors, infra-red light sensors, and heart rate sensors, adapted for attachment to textile and clothing; Bioelectric sensors, namely, EKG leads, ECG leads, EEG leads, galvanic skin response sensors, infra-red light sensors, and heart rate sensors, coupled with light emitters adapted for coupling with clothing, namely, sweaters, pants, shirts, jackets, collars, cowls, coats, belts and hats; Bioelectric sensors, namely, EKG leads, ECG leads, EEG leads, galvanic skin response sensors, infra-red light sensors, and heart rate sensors, coupled with light emitters for use with jewelry, namely, finger rings, earrings, bracelets, anklets, necklaces, body jewelry and jewelry configured to pierce skin; Bioelectric sensor circuits, namely, EKG leads, ECG leads, EEG leads, galvanic skin response sensors, infra-red light sensors, and heart rate sensors, for use with cosmetics; Bioelectric sensor circuits, namely, EKG leads, ECG leads, EEG leads, galvanic skin response sensors, infra-red light sensors, and heart rate sensors, for use with stickers adapted for temporary attachment to human skin; Bioelectric sensor circuits, namely, EKG leads, ECG leads, EEG leads, galvanic skin response sensors, infra-red light sensors, and heart rate sensors, adapted for incorporation with tattoos affixed with or within human skin; Wearable bioelectric sensor circuits, namely, EKG leads, ECG leads, EEG leads, galvanic skin response sensors, infra-red light sensors, and heart rate sensors, adapted to detect a quality of human posture; Wearable bioelectric sensor circuits, namely, EKG leads, ECG leads, EEG leads, galvanic skin response sensors, infra-red light sensors, and heart rate sensors, coupled with light emitting circuits and adapted to detect a quality of human posture | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 14, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 25, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2018 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 9, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 8, 2018 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2018 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 8, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 8, 2017 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2017 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 11, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2017 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 11, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 8, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 13, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 23, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 30, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 10, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2015 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 3, 2015 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 19, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 16, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 24, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 15, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 24, 2014 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 14, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 9, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2014 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |