USPTO serial 86160850
ALMO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCDORMAN, ROGER THOMAS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ALMO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael C. Baum
MICHAEL C. BAUM RESCH POLSTER & BERGER LLP1840 CENTURY PARK E FL 17LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-2101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Animal oils and fats; Blended oil; Blended vegetable oils; Butter; Canola oil; Coconut oil; Cooking oil; Corn oil; Edible oils; Edible oils and edible fats; Edible oils and fats, preserves and pickles; Flaxseed oil for culinary purposes; Hardened oils; Honey butter; Jams; Margarine, edible oils and fats; Meat, fruit and vegetable jellies, jams, eggs; Oils and fats for food; Preserved fruit and vegetables; Processed fruits; Processed meat; Processed oils and fats; Processed seafood; Processed vegetables and fruits; Ready-to-eat meals comprised primarily of meats, cheese and also including rice, pasta and vegetables; Salad oil; Shortening; Soups and preparations for making soups; Tuna fish, not live; Vegetable oils; Vegetable oils and fats; Prepared entrees consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Honey; Honey; Honey substitutes | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Fresh fruit; Fresh vegetables | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2014 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 9, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |