USPTO serial 86161226
MENDO CALI NOR CAL'S HIGH GRADE SMOKE SHOP SPARK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MENDO CALI NOR CAL'S HIGH GRADE SMOKE SHOP SPARK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Shabnam Malek
Shabnam Malek Brand & Branch LLP1714 Franklin Street #100-336Oakland, CA 94612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 034 | Tobacco and tobacco products, namely, cigarettes, smokers' articles, namely, tobacco pipes, cigarette filters, cigars, cigarillos, chewing and snuff tobacco; tobacco filters, tobacco pipe cleaners, tobacco pouches, tobacco substitute not for medical purposes; matches, and lighters, namely, cigar lighters, cigarette lighters, and lighters for smokers, excluding automobile lighters; Electronic cigarettes; smoking alternatives, namely, smokeless cigarette vaporizer pipe; electronic smoking vaporizers, namely, electronic cigarettes; electronic cigars, namely, vapor cigars; electronic cigarette components in the nature of electronic nicotine inhalation devices comprised of electronic cigarette refill cartridges, electronic cigarette atomizers, electronic cigarette cartomizers and refill liquid nicotine solutions distributed as a unit; tobacco water pipes | ACTIVE | Oct 15, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 4, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 8, 2017 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2017 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2017 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 15, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 23, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 23, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 28, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 26, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 25, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 3, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 2, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 21, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2014 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |