USPTO serial 86161902
SMRT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 29, 2016
- Examiner
- ARANT, LUCY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 117
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with SMRT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Evan R. Witt
Evan R. Witt KIRTON MCCONKIE36 South State Street, Suite 1900SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-1004United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Direction finders, namely, electronic devices for detecting or monitoring or tracking or indicating the direction or range of an item or person using radio transmissions, electronic emissions, radio emissions, electro-magnetic emissions; electronic transmitters and receivers for detecting or monitoring or indicating the direction of radio transmissions, electronic emissions, radio emissions, electro-magnetic emission, distress signals, radio communication; acoustic sound alarms, aerials, [ batteries, batteries for lighting, battery chargers, ] luminous beacons, underwater breathing apparatus, marking buoys, signalling buoys, directional compasses, flashing safety lights, acoustic sound alarms and sound alarms with flashing safety lights, for indicating position in reduced visibility weather, optical lanterns, lifebelts, lifebuoys, life jackets, life nets, life saving rafts, light conducting filaments, nautical apparatus and instruments, namely, electronic position indicating instruments, radar apparatus or detectors, sonar, marine depth finders, global positioning system tracking devices, electronic navigational apparatus and instruments for controlling, adjusting, steering and keeping courses; electronic navigational instruments; radar apparatus, radios, range finders, signalling whistles, sirens, telecommunication transmitters, electronic signal transmitters; electronic apparatus and instruments for detecting, tracking and finding beacons; electroluminescent warning flashing and safety lights; safety equipment, namely, flashing and steady safety lights for life saving apparatus, electronic alarms for life saving apparatus, and automated valves for inflating life jackets; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2023 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2023 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 11, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 19, 2023 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2023 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 27, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 11, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2016 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2016 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 30, 2016 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2016 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | ERRS | TEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT | — |
| Jul 27, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 27, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 30, 2015 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2015 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2015 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 2, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 12, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 23, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 14, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 14, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |