USPTO serial 86165283
GELFAST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GELFAST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
RENO, NV
Reno, CO
Reno, CO
RENO, NV
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J. Lee
DAVID J. LEE MaximizeIP LLC357 South McCaslin Blvd - Ste 200Louisville, CO 80027-2932UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Clay-containing chemical additives for oil-well drilling fluid that enhance the rate of gelling | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HECTATONE INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Western Lithium Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Western Lithium Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by KINGS VALLEY CLAY, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named GELFAST
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 27, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 25, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2017 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 29, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 14, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2016 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 8, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 23, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 21, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 22, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 20, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 14, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 21, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 26, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 6, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 18, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 27, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 23, 2014 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 16, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 30, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2014 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |