USPTO serial 86166633
SUPER ALL-INCLUSIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4634474Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 4, 2014
- Examiner
- CHANG, KATHERINE S
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SUPER ALL-INCLUSIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Georgetown, KY
Georgetown, KY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter J. Riebling
PETER J. RIEBLING KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP1717 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.Suite 1025WASHINGTON, DC 20006-3951Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Hotel, bar and restaurant services; cafe services; cafeteria services; cocktail lounge services; snack bar services; providing community centers for social gatherings and meetings; providing conference rooms for social gatherings and meetings; providing general purpose facilities for meetings and exhibitions; providing temporary accommodations; providing temporary lodging at hotels; reservation and booking services for temporary accommodations, lodging, and hotels | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 25, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2021 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 4, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 29, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 22, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 5, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 5, 2014 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2014 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 3, 2014 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2014 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |