Drawing for ARSITE

USPTO serial 86167000

ARSITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CANTOR, JILLIAN REDDING
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARSITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bryan A. Fuller

BRYAN A. FULLER HALL ESTILL HARDWICK GABLE GOLDEN & NELSON, P.C.100 N BROADWAY AVE STE 2900OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73102-8865UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and software system for tracking people, location, health data, and work time using radio frequency with a device on the tracked people; Computer hardware and software system for tracking objects and location using radio frequency with a device on the tracked objectsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 29, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 29, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 1, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 25, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 30, 2015NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Oct 30, 2015TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Oct 30, 2015PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 30, 2015PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 31, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 27, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 27, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 2, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 12, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 27, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 7, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 7, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 7, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 7, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 7, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 6, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 6, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 6, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 24, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 30, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 20, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance