USPTO serial 86168893
PRO MAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 8, 2020
- Examiner
- PERKINS, ELLEN J
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with PRO MAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $325
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen R. Baird
Stephen R. Baird GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP90 South Seventh Street, Suite 3500Minneapolis, MN 55402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | non-medicated soaps, namely body soaps, hand soaps; all-purpose cleaners; non-medicated skin care preparations; hair care preparations; mouthwash | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Rwachsberg Holdings Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Rwachsberg Holdings Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Rwachsberg Holdings Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by APOLLO HEALTHCARE CORP.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named PRO MAN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2023 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 8, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 22, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 2, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 7, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 31, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 24, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 18, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 12, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 10, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 28, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 4, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 24, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 30, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |