USPTO serial 86170582
RUGGED LOGIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 26, 2017
- Examiner
- COOPER, CHRISTINE H
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with RUGGED LOGIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $1,300
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chantilly, VA, US
Reston, VA, US
Chantilly, VA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ralph P. Albrecht
Ralph P. Albrecht Reston Law Group, LLP2100 RESTON PARKWAY, SUITE 450,RESTON, VA 20191UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Mobile communication systems, namely, voice communication systems, namely, analog systems and Voice-Over-Internet-Protocol (VoIP) systems consisting of analog telephone adapters, analog telephones, VoIP phone software applications, and VoIP telephones; data/networking systems, namely, land mobile radio, power over Ethernet, wired Ethernet, wireless, SATCOM connectivity, and cellular WAN systems consisting of satellite modems, satellite terminals, wireless broadband radios, two-way radios, wired Ethernet transceivers, wireless radios, networking routers, and Ethernet switches; electronic encryption units; performance packaging, namely, rigid environmentally sealed shock and vibration absorbing enclosures specially adapted to hold and protect electronic mobile communications systems from harmful environmental conditions; user interfaces for electrotechnical and electronic devices; integrated power, namely, uninterruptible power supplies, wideband AC and DC current converters, and smart electrical power distribution units; computer software for computer setup assistance, monitoring and control of electronic devices; mobile electrical power integration systems consisting of solar power converters, battery chargers, generator converters, multi-output power supplies, and power supply connectors for alternative supply of electrical power to electronic devices; ruggedized customized containers specially adapted for the protective storage of electronic devices; and automated systems consisting of optical sensors, acoustic sensors, environmental sensors, electrical controllers, electric motors, actuators, and wireless communications electronics, namely, radios, mobile phones, and modems in the fields of robotics and sensing technology | ACTIVE | Oct 25, 2014 |
| 042 | Computer software design for others; design and development of automated computer software systems for others in the fields of robotics and sensing technology; engineering analysis of product development for others in the fields of thermal analysis, flow analysis, stress/displacement analysis, RF linked budgets and reverse engineering; and new product design for others in the fields of system design, RF component integration, circuit design, controller design, actuator integration, sensor integration, mechanical design, firmware/software design, testing, manufacturing design, and documentation development of system manuals | ACTIVE | May 22, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Rugged Logic, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Rugged Logic, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Rugged Logic, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named RUGGED LOGIC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2023 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2023 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 2, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 17, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 17, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2022 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2020 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Oct 12, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 12, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 19, 2017 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2017 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 9, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 24, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 23, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2016 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 21, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 14, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 12, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 19, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 31, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 19, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 17, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 28, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 14, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 1, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 29, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |