Drawing for AXOSMART

USPTO serial 86170622

AXOSMART

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5100710Status 704Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 13, 2016
Examiner
KHAN, AHSEN M
Law office
—

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 704: Status 704 applies to Madrid Protocol extensions of protection in the U.S. Section 71 (similar to Section 8) showing continued use was accepted. The U.S. extension remains active.

Need help with AXOSMART?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*

Plus Government fees of $1,300

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Denis V. Shamo

Ruben Rausings gataTetra Pak - Trademark DepartmentLund, 22186

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines, namely, packaging machines, load unitization machines used for packaging, material handling and packaging machines in the nature of pallet packing machines, palletizing machines, de-palletizing machines, machines for stabilizing palletized goods, machines for conveying bottles, containers and palletized goods, orientation machines for palletized goods, machines for sequential positioning of palletized good, packers and unpackersACTIVEOct 1, 2009
009Software and computer programs for the remote control of packaging machines, unitisation machines, pallet packing machines, palletising machines, de-palletising machines, machines for stabilising palletised goods, machines for conveying bottles, containers and palletised goods, orientation machines for palletised goods, machines for sequential positioning of palletized goods, packers and unpackersACTIVEOct 1, 2009
037[ Installation, maintenance and repair of packaging machines, unitisation machines, pallet packing machines, palletising machines, de-palletising machines, machines for stabilising palletised goods, machines for conveying bottles, containers and palletised goods, orientation machines for palletised goods, machines for sequential positioning of palletized goods, packers and unpackers ]SECTION 8 - CANCELLEDOct 1, 2009

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 13, 2025REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2023NAS8NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 20238.PRREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED—
Jun 9, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 5, 2023ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 4, 2023ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 13, 2022ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2021REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 14, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 13, 2016R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 9, 2016SUNANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2016CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Oct 25, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 18, 2016EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 18, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 18, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 17, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 9, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 9, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 9, 2016CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 20, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 19, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 19, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 24, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2016CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2016SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 11, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 8, 2016IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Feb 8, 2016EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Aug 4, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 31, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 31, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 17, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 23, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 23, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 3, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 12, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 27, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 25, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 24, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 24, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 24, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 1, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Jan 31, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance