Drawing for CLEARPATH

USPTO serial 86171235

CLEARPATH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOWARD, PARKER WALDRIP
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLEARPATH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Russell T. Manning

RUSSELL T. MANNING MARSH FISCHMANN & BREYFOGLE LLP8055 E TUFTS AVE STE 450DENVER, CO 80237-2837UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Transmitting weather and traffic alerts via an electronic interface, namely, computers, tablets and mobile electronic devicesACTIVE—
039Providing road and traffic informationACTIVE—
042Providing current, historical, and future weather information; providing users with information and databases about current, historical, and future weather, and traffic, namely, weather analytics, weather forecasts, radar imagery, satellite imagery and site-specific weather and road conditions, road temperatures, wind speed, wind direction, visibility, precipitation, precipitation rate, precipitation type, precipitation accumulation, and traffic analytics, traffic congestion, traffic patterns, traffic performance, traffic bottlenecks, traffic accidents and road closures, respectively, via an electronic interface, namely, computers, tablets and mobile electronic devices; providing weather information through computer based networks, wireless systems, satellites via subscription-based portalsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 10, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 10, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 27, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 25, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 8, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 8, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 8, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 13, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 13, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 23, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 4, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 27, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 19, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 4, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 4, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 4, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 4, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 4, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 28, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 21, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 21, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 19, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 1, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Jan 31, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance