USPTO serial 86172232
Serial No. 86172232
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 86172232?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bensenville, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John S. Mortimer
F WILLIAM MCLAUGHLIN WOOD PHILLIPS KATZ CLARK & MORTIMER500 W MADISON STSTE 1130CHICAGO, IL 60661-2556Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | humidifiers for household use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2015 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 29, 2015 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 29, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 7, 2015 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 14, 2015 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 28, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 19, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 19, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 28, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 30, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |