USPTO serial 86173754
SUBVIEW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORWIN, CHARLOTTE K
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUBVIEW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Diego, CA
San Diego, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven C. Tietsworth
STEVEN C. TIETSWORTH SEESCAN, INC.3855 RUFFIN RDSAN DIEGO, CA 92123-1813UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Video pipe inspection systems comprising a camera head mounted to the end of a push-cable that is windable about a push reel; hand-held electronic devices with displays connected by cables to cameras designed for manual insertion into pipes, ducts, tubes and walls by plumbers and electricians for reviewing their interiors to locate defects and obstructions, to fish wires, to control the cameras, to record images, and/or to generate data files related to the images; utility locators, namely, devices for electromagnetically locating hidden or buried utilities, namely, pipes, conduits, cables, or other conductors; electromagnetic sensors for magnetic detection of hidden or buried objects; metal detectors; leak detectors for determining leaks in underground pipes or conduits using electromagnetic sensing; electromagnetic sensor devices for use in detecting and mapping hidden or buried objects; utility locators comprised of electromagnetic sensors, processing circuits, and memory for mapping hidden or buried utilities and storing associated information; apparatus for displaying information and images of hidden or buried utilities or other objects, namely, video displays and monitors coupled to video inspection cameras or utility locators; LCD panel displays for providing textual or graphical information associated with hidden or buried utilities; mobile base stations for communicating with buried utility locators, transmitters, and/or remote server systems to send or receive information associated with hidden or buried utilities and/or control or coordinate operation of the locators or transmitters during operations to find hidden or buried utilities; electronic devices for sending electromagnetic signals from within hidden or buried pipes or conduits; electronic devices for integrating position or location information with radio signals and sending the position of location information; electronic devices for integrating information associated with hidden or buried utilities with geographical location information and displaying or storing the integrated information; buried utility locators comprised of GPS or other positioning system receivers. transmitters for sending radio signals with integrated data or information; buried electronic markers using radio frequency identification (RFID) information to mark underground locations in pipes, conduits, or other cavities; devices for receiving RFID signals, determining associated information, and integrating the associated information with hidden or buried utility information and/or geographic location information; well inspection equipment for optically inspecting wells or other cavities; video inspection equipment, namely, video cameras, cables, and image or video display devices for optically inspecting equipment; optical and electromagnetic sensors for locating underwater objects; electromagnetic sensors for inspecting piping; electromagnetic sensors for locating faults in pipes, wires, or conduits; underground lighting controls and LEDs for illuminating areas being imaged within pipes, conduits, or other cavities; electronic sensors for locating buried utility faults; electronic sensors for locating sheath faults; horizontal directional drilling equipment, namely, electromagnetic beacons for horizontal directional drilling; electronic sondes and beacons used as horizontal drilling locating equipment; software for generating maps of hidden or buried utilities or buried objects; software for detecting, displaying, mapping and/or storing information associated with hidden or buried conduits, pipes, conductors, or other utilities or objects by receiving and processing magnetic field signals emitted from the utilities; software for integrating location or position information with buried utility or object information and displaying or storing the integrated information; software for generating maps including information associated with hidden or buried utilities or other buried objects; software programs sold and distributed on tangible storage media or over the Internet to allow users of still camera and video camera inspection systems for underground pipes, conduits, and cavities to generate and manage still inspection images, inspection videos, associated data, and associated reports; software for providing inspection information and reports related to electromagnetically sensed hidden or buried pipes, cables, wires, or other objects; software for processing images or video based on information provided from RFID tags; software for combining information from RFID tags with geographic location information and storing or displaying the associated combined information; application software for enabling construction personnel and others to make requests for the location of buried pipes, cables, and other underground utilities prior to excavating construction sites; application software for identifying the location of buried pipes, cables, and other underground utilities prior to excavation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 16, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 21, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2017 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2017 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 9, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 8, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 15, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 2, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 10, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 13, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 24, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 28, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 26, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 28, 2014 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 21, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 1, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |