USPTO serial 86174856
ACCUPLACER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUONG, SUI
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ACCUPLACER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sharon A Zink
45 COLUMBUS AVENEW YORK, NY 10023-6917UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | educational services, namely, a computer-adaptive testing program offered by means of an interactive web site on the Internet enabling high schools and colleges to assess test takers' ability in a variety of subjects; providing an interactive tutorial to prepare test takers for a computer-adaptive placement testing program by means of an interactive web site on the Internet; development, administration, and evaluation of a computer-adaptive testing program; scoring, analyzing and reporting computer-adaptive testing program test results; providing information, training and technical support regarding a computer-adaptive placement testing program by means of an interactive web site on the Internet and by seminars, conferences, and workshops | ACTIVE | Apr 5, 1999 |
| 041 | educational services, namely, a computer-adaptive testing program offered by means of an interactive web site on the Internet enabling high schools and colleges to assess test takers' ability in a variety of subjects; providing an interactive tutorial to prepare test takers for a computer-adaptive placement testing program by means of an interactive web site on the Internet; development, administration, and evaluation of a computer-adaptive testing program; scoring, analyzing and reporting computer-adaptive testing program test results; providing information, training and technical support regarding a computer-adaptive placement testing program by means of an interactive web site on the Internet and by seminars, conferences, and workshops | ACTIVE | Apr 5, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 4, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 7, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |