Drawing for IT'SME

USPTO serial 86175521

IT'SME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POLZER, NATALIE M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IT'SME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher James Horgan

CHRISTOPHER HORGAN ROARK IP1438 DAHLIA LOOPSAN JOSE, CA 95126UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Communications software for providing real-time transaction authorization or access to physical premises using out-of-band security as a service (SECaaS) over an intranet, internet, or communication channel by using contextual information to verify the authority of the initiator of the transaction or access through any electronic device including electronic smart tattoos, implanted electronics in the nature of biometric identification apparatus, and handheld devices in the nature of mobile phones, smart connected devices and traditional computing devices, namely, personal computers, notebooks, tablet computers, phones and netbooks; other portable computers, computer peripherals; personal digital assistants; or any embedded computing and communication devices, namely, electronics devices comprised primarily of software and display screens for viewing, sending and receiving texts, emails, data, and information from smart phones, tablet computers and portable computersACTIVE—
035Electronic signature real-time verification services provided in connection with banking and financial servicesACTIVE—
036Credit and cash card services; Electronic banking via a global computer network; On-line banking services; On-line banking services featuring electronic alerts that alert credit and debit card users when a single transaction exceeds a certain amount; On-line financial planning services; On-line prepaid card services; On- line real-time currency trading; On-line trading of financial instruments, shares, options and other derivative products; On-line trading of options on the options exchange market; Online, real-time tax payment processing, tax payment management, and tax payment analysis servicesACTIVE—
038Communication services for providing real-time transaction authorization and/or access to an electronic account or physical premises using an out-of-band security as a service (SECaaS) over an internet or communication channel through transmission of voice, audio, visual images and data by telecommunications networks, wireless communication networks, the Internet, information services networks and data networks; Wireless digital messaging services; Wireless electronic transmission of data, telecommunication services, namely, transmission of voice, data, graphics and video by means of wireless communication networks, the Internet, information services networks and data networks; electronic transmission for others of securities and financial information via computer linking services, namely, communicating and routing trade information involving orders, entry and execution services, to others via a global computer networkACTIVE—
042Scientific and technological services, namely, research and design in the field of secure and private transaction using multifactor authentication techniques including contextual and biometrics as part of policy orchestration for secure transaction authorization by authorized users and machines; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for trust elevation and security of online transactions; Software application development services; Security as a Service (SECaaS) featuring communication software use in providing real- time transaction authorization for intranet and Internet transactions; cloud computing featuring communication software for use in providing real-time transaction authorization or access to physical premises using an out-of- band security as a service; online content management services via the Internet, namely, providing a website that gives computer users real-time transaction authorization; providing a web hosting platform for use of software for enabling, facilitating or enhancing interactive transaction history and data for business and consumersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 6, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 4, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 28, 2016MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 28, 2016ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 28, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 18, 2016EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 29, 2016GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2016GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2016CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jul 11, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 11, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 8, 2016EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 8, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 8, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 7, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 1, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 11, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 11, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 21, 2015RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 29, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 28, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 28, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 7, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 7, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 7, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 7, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 6, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Feb 5, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance