USPTO serial 86178614
AGROPUR DAIRY COOPERATIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIBB, SCOTT
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AGROPUR DAIRY COOPERATIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Longueuil, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frances M. Jagla
FRANCES M. JAGLA LANE POWELL PC601 SW 2ND AVE STE 2100PORTLAND, OR 97204-3158UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Casein, caseinates for the food industry, lactose to be used in the manufacture of foodstuffs; wheat gluten for the food industry | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Milk; skim milk; milk powder; cheese, dairy substitutes for baked goods, namely, whey, dry whey, and non-fat dried milk for food; soy proteins, soups, egg substitutes for baked goods; proteins for use as a food additive and food filler, namely, milk proteins, evaporated milk, milk powder, whey proteins; cultured buttermilk powders; food additives for non-nutritional purposes for use as a flavoring, ingredient and filler namely, hydrocolloids, gums, stabilizers, flavor potentiators, dairy powders, starches, fibers, yeasts, botanicals, sweeteners, aroma chemicals, milk powders, buttermilk, lactose, whey, nonfat dry milk. deproteinized whey; dairy based ingredients for use in food and feed applications, namely, milk solids, sweet whey powder; custom made dairy based blends for food and feed industry, namely, non-fat, low-carbohydrate, high-protein dairy-based mix for making non-dessert foods, namely, crusts, sweet goods, tortillas, beverages, cheese products, cultured products, and animal feed nutrition; dairy based and non-dairy based blends for the confection industry, namely, non-dairy based mix for making whipped toppings; dairy substitutes for baked goods, namely, dry whey; dairy based ingredients for use in food and feed applications, namely, delactose whey powder; whey protein concentrate; dairy based ingredients for use in food and feed applications, namely, whey protein isolates, whey permeate, whey phospholipids; frozen desserts namely, ice cream cakes, ice cream bars, ice milk and frozen yogurt; milk powder; buttermilk, not cultured; butter oil being anhydrous milk fat; Cheese powders; cultured dairy powders, namely, yogurt powders, sweet cream powder, sour cream powder, non-dairy creamers, dairy-based powders for making dairy-based food beverages and shakes; non-dairy based mix for making whipped toppings; dairy-based snack foods excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; dairy-based beverage blend; dairy based blends for food and feed industry; sour cream and sour cream substitutes | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | bases for making soup, namely, for flavoring and thickening purposes; seasoning mixes for making soup; mixes for bakery goods for food manufacturing purposes, namely, powder bread bases, powder dough bases, powder donut mixes, powder cake mixes, muffin mixes, powder mixes for bakery goods, namely, bread mixes, brownie mixes, cake mixes, cookie mixes, icing mixes; mixes for making bakery batters; mixes for making breading; grain-based snack foods; soya flour; gluten-free dry blend bases for the bakery industry blend bases for the bakery industry, namely, sweet goods, breads, cakes, crusts, tortillas; parve-based dry blends, namely, non-dairy powder products that are parve certified and sold to manufacturers of parve food products; frozen desserts, namely, ice cream, ice cream cakes, ice cream bars; ice milk; frozen yogurt; iced tea | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Lemonade, non-alcoholic fruit drinks and fruit juices; beverages containing soy protein, namely, soy-based beverages not being milk substitutes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AGROPUR COOPERATIVE
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named AGROPUR DAIRY COOPERATIVE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 10, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 12, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 13, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 30, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 19, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |