USPTO serial 86178652
TITAMAXSMART EX ACQUA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KENEALY, NATALIE LANGFORD
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TITAMAXSMART EX ACQUA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
JJGC INDÚSTRIA E COMÉRCIO DE MATERIAIS DENTÁRIOS S.A.
3291,CIC, Curitiba, PR, BR
Other trademarks owned by JJGC INDÚSTRIA E COMÉRCIO DE MATERIAIS DENTÁRIOS S.A.
JJGC INDÚSTRIA E COMÉRCIO DE MATERIAIS DENTÁRIOS S.A.
3291,CIC, Curitiba, PR, BR
Other trademarks owned by JJGC INDÚSTRIA E COMÉRCIO DE MATERIAIS DENTÁRIOS S.A.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard S. Stockton
RICHARD S. STOCKTON BANNER & WITCOFF, LTD.10 S WACKER DR STE 3000CHICAGO, IL 60606-7437UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Dental instruments, namely, instruments used to keep the mouth open during dental procedures, cheek retractors, burnishers, mirrors; surgical retractors; dental needles; surgical levers; teething rings; braces for teeth; ligating loops for surgical use; link ligations for surgical use; artificial teeth; artificial jaws; forceps for dental technical purposes; dental drills; dentures; medical guidewires; hard wires for orthodontic use; surgical implants comprising artificial materials; surgical clips; tongue scrapers; artificial limbs; dental burrs; surgical screws; surgical clamps; pins for artificial teeth; trocars; dental apparatus for implantology, namely, dental implants; dental instruments or apparatus to enable insertion into the bone, namely, surgical instruments, surgical kits comprised primarily of surgical instruments, prosthetic instruments, height measurer, depth probe, surgical mallet, titanium tweezers, drill extension, trephine drill, torque wrench, contra-angle driver, manual driver, prosthetic adapting driver, manual screwdriver, blade and bivers handle, bone grafting screw, bone mill with ratchet, columbia retractor, and curette for sinus lifting; surgical apparatus and instruments; electric dental apparatus for drilling | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by JJGC INDÚSTRIA E COMÉRCIO DE MATERIAIS DENTÁRIOS S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by JJGC INDÚSTRIA E COMÉRCIO DE MATERIAIS DENTÁRIOS S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named TITAMAXSMART EX ACQUA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 9, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 8, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 24, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 24, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 8, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 14, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 24, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 13, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 13, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |