Drawing for SURFACE PERFECT FIBERS

USPTO serial 86178656

SURFACE PERFECT FIBERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SURFACE PERFECT FIBERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher B. Schneider

Christopher B. Schneider Newell Brands Inc.3500 Lacey Road, 10th floorDowners Grove, IL 60515UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Cleaning products, namely, pushbrooms, brooms, dustpans, scrubbers in the nature of scrubbing brushes, scrubbing and dish brushes, and bowl and toilet brushesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 7, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 7, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 21, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 21, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 5, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 5, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jan 6, 2017EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 21, 2016EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 21, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 21, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 15, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 13, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 2016TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jul 12, 2016PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 12, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 20, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 19, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 30, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 30, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 30, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 29, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 18, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 18, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 17, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 12, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 19, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 19, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 17, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 17, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2014NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 6, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 16, 2014NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 29, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 28, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 12, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 11, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 11, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 26, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 11, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 1, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance