USPTO serial 86179120
PET FOOD GONE WILD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TENG, SIMON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PET FOOD GONE WILD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Animal repellents, namely, sprays used to train dogs to keep off furniture; Diapers for dogs; Dietary supplements for dogs and cats; Enzyme food supplements; Feed supplements for dogs and cats; Food supplements for dogs and cats; Mineral food supplements; Nutritional supplements in capsule form for dogs; Vitamins and dietary food supplements for animals. Full grooming facility for dog and cat | ACTIVE | Sep 7, 2011 |
| 018 | Belly bands for dogs and cats; Dog apparel; Dog clothing; Dog coats; Dog collars; Dog collars and leads; Dog leashes; Dog parkas; Dog shoes; Neckwear for dogs; Rawhide chews for dogs | ACTIVE | Sep 7, 2011 |
| 020 | Cat scratching pads; Cat scratching posts; Dog beds; Dog kennels; Plastic vinyl sheets for attachment to furniture to prevent damage caused by cat scratching; Scratching posts for cats | ACTIVE | Sep 7, 2011 |
| 021 | Abrasive liner for cat litter boxes; Animal-activated pet feeders that include dispensers for releasing pet toy feeder balls with pet food and pet treats therein; Bird baths; Bird cages; Bird cages for domestic birds; Bird feeders; Bird feeding tables; Bird houses; Cat litter boxes; Cat litter pans; Covers for bird perches; Dog food scoops; Filters for use in cat litter boxes; Grooming tools for pets, namely, combs and brushes; Home dental care products for dogs and cats, namely, toothbrush; Household storage containers for pet food; Perches for bird cages; Pet grooming device comprising a built in brush head and an attachment that connects to vacuums | ACTIVE | Sep 7, 2011 |
| 028 | Cat toys; Dog toys | ACTIVE | Sep 7, 2011 |
| 031 | Bird food; Bird seed; Bird treats; Cat food; Cat litter; Cat litter and litter for small animals; Cat litters; Cat treats; Cuttlebones for birds; Digestible chewing bones for dogs; Dog biscuits; Dog food; Dog treats; Edible chews for dogs; Edible food for animals for chewing; Edible organic pet treats for dogs and cats; Edible vegan pet treats for dogs and cats; Food for animals; Food for rodents; Pet food | ACTIVE | Sep 7, 2011 |
| 044 | Animal grooming; Animal grooming services; Dog grooming services; Pet care services, namely, dog walking, dog bathing and non-medicated pet grooming; Pet care services, namely, dog walking, dog bathing, non-medicated pet grooming and in-home medical care; Pet grooming services; Providing information in the fields of animals and pet breeding, selection of the animals and pets, grooming, health and nutrition; Providing on-line information via the Internet in the fields of animals and pets, relating to breeding, selection of the animals and pets, grooming, feeding and nutrition; Providing self-service pet grooming facilities | ACTIVE | Sep 7, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Vasquez, Frida, Susanna
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named PET FOOD GONE WILD
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 2, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 17, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 19, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |