USPTO serial 86179255
SYN-TACTICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEIN, JAMES W
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SYN-TACTICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James K. Poole
JAMES K. POOLE JAMES K. POOLE, ESQ.PO BOX 925LOVELAND, CO 80539-0925UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Training devices in the nature of educational training blocks, namely, two- and three-dimensional information shapes which can be identified as symbolizing parts of speech, punctuation and diacritical marks and the like in the nature of nouns, pronouns, verbs, adverbs, definite and indefinite articles, adjectives, verbals, conjunctions, interjections and words which are the subjects or objects of verbs, in a given sentence, by at least one of the features selected from color, shapes, texture, letters and numbers including Braille versions of letters and numbers, designed and adapted to be fastened together in series, patterns or arrangements to represent grammatical structures and other aspects of language, namely, phrases, clauses and sentence patterns, whether simple, compound or complex | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Services using educational training blocks as well as educational and learning publications, namely, books, manuals and flash cards to train instructors to employ the devices to train students in language and composition skills and for the employment of the trained instructors in such instruction of students in language and composition skills and for the employment of the trained instructors in such instruction of students in educational and training institutions, namely, language schools, academic schools and functional training schools at all levels, all featuring instruction in composition and speech, all in the field of English and other Indo-European languages, including Romance and Germanic languages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 23, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 22, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 4, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2016 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2016 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 21, 2016 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2016 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 23, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 23, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 21, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2015 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 24, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 4, 2015 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 22, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 15, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 14, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 14, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 14, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 31, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |