Drawing for GET TO THE GOOD STUFF

USPTO serial 86179793

GET TO THE GOOD STUFF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GET TO THE GOOD STUFF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julie C. VanDerZanden

Julie C. VanDerZanden Quickie Manufacturing Company413 Pine Street, Third FloorJarden Seattle Legal DepartmentSeattle, WA 98101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal replacement broom and mop handlesACTIVE—
019Non-luminous, non-mechanical floor signs not of metalACTIVE—
020Non-metal replacement broom and mop handlesACTIVE—
021Cleaning products, namely, pushbrooms, brooms, dustpans, mops, mop heads, buckets, scrubbers in the nature of abrasive mesh and sponge with abrasive surface, dusting gloves, cleaning wipes in the nature of woven and non-woven disposable textile wipes not impregnated with chemicals or compounds, sponges, squeegees, cleaning cloths, lint rollers, scrub and dish brushes, bowl and toilet brushes, whisks, cleaning caddy in the nature of organizers for household use specifically adapted for carrying cleaning supplies, plungers for clearing blocked drains, microfiber towels and dusting cloths, and dustersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 9, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 9, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 7, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 4, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 2, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 2, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 2, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 25, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 9, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 9, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 17, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 16, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 19, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 19, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 17, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 17, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2014NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 14, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 24, 2014NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 6, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 6, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 23, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 6, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 6, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 6, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 20, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 11, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance