USPTO serial 86179937
BEAT THE TRAFFIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BEAT THE TRAFFIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Oakville, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brooke Erdos Singer, Kevin S. Blum
BROOKE ERDOS SINGER, KEVIN S. BLUM DAVIS & GILBERT LLP1740 BROADWAY FL 3NEW YORK, NY 10019-4379UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Mobile applications and computer software used for delivery of traffic information, traffic alerts, travel and transportation-related information and commentary; Software for accessing and displaying traffic information, traffic alerts, travel and transportation-related information and commentary | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Placing advertisements for others in the field of traffic information, traffic alerts, travel and transportation-related information and commentary | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Providing traffic information, traffic alerts, travel and transportation-related information and commentary on the internet, through online publishers, by email, by text messaging services, through mobile services, through television broadcasts, and for newspapers and other print publications; Traffic information services; Providing information and editorial content concerning traffic flow, maps containing traffic flow information, incident data showing particulars of scheduled incidents which affect traffic flow, such as planned road closures, and particulars of unscheduled incidents which affect traffic flow, such as accidents, police, fire or other emergency service road closure, or road damage or blockage due to any other unplanned cause | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing weather and road driving condition forecasting services and weather reporting | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pelmorex Media Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BEAT THE TRAFFIC
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 15, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 18, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 17, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 12, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |