USPTO serial 86180041
MO' BETTAHS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLLOPY, DIANE PATRICIA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MO' BETTAHS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Derek Anderson
DEREK ANDERSON PIA ANDERSON DORIUS REYNARD & MOSS222 S MAIN STSUITE 1830SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101-2198Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Restaurant services featuring Hawaiian-style food and steak plates; Restaurant services, including sit-down service of food and take-out restaurant services; Restaurant services, namely, providing of food and beverages for consumption on and off the premises | ACTIVE | Dec 6, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 27, 2016 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 27, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 9, 2016 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 12, 2016 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Jun 22, 2016 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2016 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2016 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 23, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 21, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 21, 2015 | RMDT | EXAMINERS REQUEST FOR REMAND TO TTAB | — |
| Dec 21, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 19, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 4, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 4, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 4, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 4, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 15, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 14, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 1, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 6, 2014 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| May 6, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 5, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |