Drawing for MORPHOMAESTRO

USPTO serial 86180736

MORPHOMAESTRO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PEETE, KYLE C
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MORPHOMAESTRO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian B. Darville

Brian B. Darville Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.1940 Duke StreetAlexandria, VA 22314-3454UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for communication between a central bank of biometric data, stations and mobile terminals for enrolment or for verification of individuals' biometric characteristics, other than for any application intended as a means of payment or in the banking sectorACTIVE—
042Updating, design, rental and installation of computer software for communication between a central bank of biometric data, stations and mobile terminals for enrolment or for verification of individuals' biometric characteristics, other than for any application intended as a means of payment or in the banking sector; technical support for the aforesaid computer software, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems, by email, live chat support, phone support, remote PC, and onsite servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 11, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 9, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 14, 2018ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 11, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2018CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 4, 2018SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 4, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 4, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 30, 2018IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 30, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 30, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 30, 2018EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Nov 1, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 30, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 30, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 30, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 20, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 30, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 4, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 4, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 15, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 11, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 17, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 5, 2017ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2016GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 15, 2016GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 15, 2016CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jun 3, 2016RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 28, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 28, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 28, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 16, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 16, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 8, 2015ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2015GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2015GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2015CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Mar 9, 2015RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 25, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 5, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 29, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 30, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 25, 2014AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Mar 20, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 5, 2014PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 4, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance