Drawing for AIRMIX

USPTO serial 86180827

AIRMIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AIRMIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Margaret C. McHugh

Margaret C. McHugh Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLPTwo Embarcadero Center, 8th FloorSan Francisco, CA 94111-3833UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009music streaming software; software that allows users to engage in social networking and collaboratively listing to, rate and discuss music; music jukebox softwareACTIVE—
038online music streamingACTIVE—
042computer services, namely, providing search engines and search platforms for obtaining data and content via electronic communication networks, local and global computer networks and wireless communication devices; providing online non-downloadable, web-based, and cloud based software for accessing, reviewing, and downloading music content; providing a website featuring technology that enables subscribers to search for, organize, access and play music files; providing online non-downloadable, web-based, and cloud-based software that allows users to engage in social networking and collaboratively listen to, rate, and discuss musicACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 14, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 14, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 10, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 16, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 26, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 12, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 10, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 10, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 31, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 30, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 24, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 24, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2014ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 14, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 12, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 4, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance