USPTO serial 86181646
TEKNOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 9, 2018
- Examiner
- LEE, REBECCA ANN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TEKNOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
HERMOSILLO, SONORA, MX
HERMOSILLO, SONORA, MX
HERMOSILLO, SONORA, MX
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Projection screens; Video screens | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MYP TECNOLOGIA, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by MYP TECNOLOGIA, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by MYP TECNOLOGIA, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named TEKNOL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2025 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 9, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 24, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 4, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 13, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 10, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 8, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 20, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 19, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 14, 2016 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2016 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Oct 13, 2016 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Oct 13, 2016 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 29, 2016 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Nov 2, 2015 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 12, 2015 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Aug 3, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2014 | GAUN | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2014 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2014 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 20, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 10, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2014 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |