USPTO serial 86184683
KARACHI BAKERY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, YATSYE ISADORA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KARACHI BAKERY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Hyderabad, IN
Hyderabad, IN
KARACHI BAKERY, MOAZAMJAHI MARKET SHOP
HYDERABAD, NY
Other trademarks owned by KARACHI BAKERY, MOAZAMJAHI MARKET SHOP
KARACHI BAKERY, MOAZAMJAHI MARKET SHOP
HYDERABAD, NY
Other trademarks owned by KARACHI BAKERY, MOAZAMJAHI MARKET SHOP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert J. Shapiro, Esq.
Robert J. Shapiro, Esq. THE SHAPIRO FIRM, LLP500 Fifth AvenueSTE 1600New York, NY 10110Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Direct response retail services by means of infomercials in the field of Biscuits, Chocolate, Confectionery, Cookie, Cocoa, Pastry, Pizzas, Pies, Spices, Nankeens, Tea, Coffee, Packed Foods, ready to eat foods, Ice Creams, Ready-mix Foods; Drive-through retail store services featuring coffee and related goods; Export agency services for the goods of others; Export and import agencies; Export and import agencies in the field of Biscuits, Chocolate, Confectionery, Cookie, Cocoa, Pastry, Pizzas, Pies, Spices, Nankeens, Tea, Coffee, Packed Foods, ready to eat foods, Ice Creams, Ready-mix Foods; Goods import-export agencies; Import agency services in the field of specialty chocolate, pastry and dessert ingredients; Providing showrooms for the goods of others in the field of Biscuits, Chocolate, Confectionery, Cookie, Cocoa, Pastry, Pizzas, Pies, Spices, Nankeens, Tea, Coffee, Packed Foods, ready to eat foods, Ice Creams, Ready-mix Foods; Retail outlets featuring Biscuits, Chocolate, Confectionery, Cookie, Cocoa, Pastry, Pizzas, Pies, Spices, Nankeens, Tea, Coffee, Packed Foods, ready to eat foods, Ice Creams, Ready-mix Foods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KARACHI BAKERY INDIA
- Other trademarks owned by KARACHI BAKERY INDIA
- Other trademarks owned by KARACHI BAKERY, MOAZAMJAHI MARKET SHOP
- Other trademarks owned by KARACHI BAKERY, MOAZAMJAHI MARKET SHOP
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named KARACHI BAKERY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2019 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2019 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 1, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 1, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 31, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 21, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2017 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 7, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 17, 2017 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2017 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 29, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 29, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 21, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 30, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 8, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 14, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 10, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |