Drawing for SKINTEC

USPTO serial 86185002

SKINTEC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARL III, FRED
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SKINTEC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elizabeth C. Buckingham

ELIZABETH C. BUCKINGHAM DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP50 South Sixth StreetSuite 1500MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1498

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable electronic newsletters in the field of architecture, building facades, and cladding technologies; downloadable electronic newsletters delivered by e-mail in the field of architecture, building facades, and cladding technologiesACTIVEApr 30, 2014

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 23, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 23, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 24, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 2015CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2015SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 26, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 19, 2015IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Feb 19, 2015EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Feb 19, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 22, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 22, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 2, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 12, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 29, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 14, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 14, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 14, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 14, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 13, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 19, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 8, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance