USPTO serial 86185353
PROTECTION PLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROTECTION PLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dennis Hopkins, Alexander Garcia and Thomas Holt
ALEXANDER J A GARCIA PERKINS COIE1201 THIRD AVENUESUITE 4900SEATTLE, WA 98101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | providing extended warranties for computer tablets, laptops and mobile digital video system comprised of video cameras and digital video recorders for real-time recording of events and evidence | ACTIVE | Jan 31, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 30, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 30, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 30, 2017 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Jul 20, 2017 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2017 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2017 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 30, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 26, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 26, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 7, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 1, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 15, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 15, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 15, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 28, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 12, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 15, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 20, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |