Drawing for RIDE GENIE

USPTO serial 86185622

RIDE GENIE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROACH, APRIL K
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RIDE GENIE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Arthur P. Tan

Arthur P. Tan Lightbulb IP, LLC11035 Lavender Hill Drive, Suite 160-205Las Vegas, NV 89135UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer application software for mobile phones and mobile devices for ordering a taxicab or other transportation option such as a limo or shuttle; Computer software for coordinating transportation services, namely, software for the automated scheduling and dispatch of motorized vehiclesACTIVE—
039Transportation reservation services for transportation operators offered on line, through texting, via a mobile app, via a website and through interactive communication systems; Transportation reservation services for passengers offered on line, through texting, via a mobile app, via a website and through interactive communication systems; Providing a website featuring information regarding transportation services and bookings for transportation servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 6, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 9, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 9, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 9, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 7, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 7, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 7, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 7, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 10, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 21, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 2, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 15, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 18, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 17, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 1, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 1, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 11, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 20, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 18, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 8, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance