Drawing for SBLOCK

USPTO serial 86188214

SBLOCK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHOSID, ROBIN S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SBLOCK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sheldon R. Meyer

SHELDON R. MEYER TUCKER ELLIS LLPSTEUART TOWER, SUITE 700ONE MARKET PLAZASAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software and hardware, namely, a computer system configuration comprised of computer servers, computer network-attached storage (NAS) hardware, computer switches, and pre-configured operating software, all sold together in a rackACTIVE—
038Global computer network consulting services, namely, consultation regarding the provision of telecommunications connections to a global computer networkACTIVE—
042Global computer network consulting services, namely, consultation regarding global computer network design; computer consultation; maintenance of computer software; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 23, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 23, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 1, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 7, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2017EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 3, 2017EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 3, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 9, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 6, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 8, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 8, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 12, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 11, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 15, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 15, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 11, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 9, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 27, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 27, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 27, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 25, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 25, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 25, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 16, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 22, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 22, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 2, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 12, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 12, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 7, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 23, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 20, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 22, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance